When conducting a Mental Capacity Assessment it is vital to understand the salient information relevant to this case. Put simply, ‘salient information’ is the relevant information that is required in order for the relevant person to be able to demonstrate capacity for the specific decision being addressed.
To help illustrate this point, we have two case studies that consider two separate decisions: whether to install bed rails, and whether to smoke.
We recently had the privilege to attend a stimulating event exploring the role of executive dysfunction and mental capacity. The afternoon was hosted by CoPPA North West and Pennine Care NHS Foundation and featured speakers from across the legal and medical professions, including Judge Simon Burrows, Barristers Rebecca Clark and Neil Allen, and Consultant Psychiatrists Dr Cathy Symonds, Dr Ade Akinola and Dr Samuel Wintrip.
When assessing Mental Capacity, it is our responsibility to inform the person we are assessing of who we are, why we are visiting them, and the purpose of the assessment.
Fluctuating capacity is when a person’s ability to make a specific decision varies over time. This is usually due to a health condition that disturbs…
According to the Mental Capacity Act (2005), a Mental Capacity Assessment is made up of two stages, functional and diagnostic. It has therefore been referred to as the ‘two-stage’ test. However, a quick browse online, alongside discussion with different professionals, reveals quite a bit of misunderstanding around how many stages there are and when these stages apply. This is perhaps due to the inconsistent way that assessments are referred to by certain institutions and professional bodies. There also seems to be some confusion between the four steps of the functional stage of an assessment, and the two stages of the overall assessment.
Clearly, terminology is important, and we should make efforts to ensure we are always using the correct terms.
A standard mental capacity assessment (also known as the two-stage test) is usually carried out for a specific decision at a specific time. It is completed prior to the decision being made if there is either a ‘reasonable belief’ that an individual may lack capacity, or to reduce the risk of someone challenging the person’s capacity to make the decision at some point in the future.
Meanwhile, a retrospective mental capacity assessment refers to a traditional assessment of capacity for a specific decision, but for a decision made historically. Examples might include a Lasting Power of Attorney submission signed and submitted the previous month, or a financial gift made to a family member or friend several years in the past.
The Code of Practice for DoLS (2008) directs that wherever possible, DoLS authorisations should be applied for in advance of a hospital or care home admission, in order to ensure that appropriate safeguards are in place from day one. As such, a DoLS application should really be made at the point where the individual is assessed prior to admittance, in order that the application be processed in time.
In previous blogs, we have explored some of the many different elements required to assess mental capacity for a specific decision. This brings us then to the two stage test, which is composed of the functional and diagnostic steps that are then bound together as part of the causative nexus (the justifiable link).
As of July 2023 there is now a new updated COP3 form (‘assessment of capacity’ for Court of Protection Submissions) available on the UK Government website. We have a growing range of blogs around this topic and area able to provide completition of Part B on referral. For a walkthrough guide of the updated document, please visit.
Consent refers to a person’s voluntary assent to a particular action, decision or interaction. There are many different types of consent. These include: